DiamondJim said:Sounds good to me. You just need to get a plan and stay with it. Let me know if I can help.
spd500 said:The problem with that idea is that the motor needs to make enough power to turn the pump faster. Its not like in a car, the faster you want to spin the pump the more power you need.
blazeracer said:An overdrive in a jet boat would be good with a turbo diesel motor that makes peak torque at 1,800 rpm, but in that case you would need a double overdrive to get the impeller up to 6k.
In theory, if an impeller needs 500 ft lbs to turn 6k rpm pushing a boat across the water, a motor that makes 500 ft lbs at 2,000 rpm should be able to get the impeller to 6k over driven 3 to 1 pushing that same boat, right? Good thought, but I don't think it will work, becaaaaaaaause......
Impellers want to be spun with high rpm horsepower. Torque x RPM = horsepower. My F250 Powerstroke makes like 225hp and 550+ foot pounds at 2,000 rpm. I don't think there is no way it would turn an overdriven impeller at 6,000.
I've always though it would be cool to run a turbo diesel with an overdrive, just to see if torque will really make it go.
I think if you overdrive a gas motor while it's turning 5k and put in OD, you will lose speed. Your motor will drop out of its poweband and never get the impeller back to 5k.
That's my theory on it. nProbably way off, but hey, it's all good.
They just had a Trailblazer SS run a 12.39 with a turbo 6.0 on Pass Time. Those little LS small blocks make a lot of power.
Last Mohican said:http://www.performanceboats.com/jet-boats/98090-jet-boat-gear-box.html
Fair amount of info on putting a gear box in a jet. People have put transmissions in jets. Really no different than what you are talking about besides being thin. There has not been a whole lot of benefit from it for a lake boat. The only exception I can think of is the diesel endurance boats with a jet.
Post 45 gives the best explanation as to why it does not work.
ChryslerJet said:Last Mohican said:http://www.performanceboats.com/jet-boats/98090-jet-boat-gear-box.html
Fair amount of info on putting a gear box in a jet. People have put transmissions in jets. Really no different than what you are talking about besides being thin. There has not been a whole lot of benefit from it for a lake boat. The only exception I can think of is the diesel endurance boats with a jet.
Post 45 gives the best explanation as to why it does not work.
Very good info and not disagreeing with anyone but there was one statement made that HP needed to push the boat at 40mph at 3500rpms that if rpms dropped to 2500 would still need the same HP at 2500 to go 40 as had at 3500. Now given those numbers if the motor was built with the Torque and HP curves where that was the case then an overdrive should work in that case in therory but you have to take into account that the overdrive robs some HP from the engine. It's something great to bench and would be cool to test out in theory. I guess I will have to build a unit for my cars first then mod it for the boat later.
Last Mohican said:You can throw anything you learned about a car out the window on this subject. It would be no different than the results those guys already had with an OD. Once you get a car up to speed it takes less work to keep it there. The amount of work it takes to keep a jet boat at speed is damn near equal to the amount it takes to get it there. The resistance of the water against the hull is very different than the resistance of a car going down the road. With a car you are fighting wind resistance and rolling resistance of the bearings. With a boat you are fighting the water resistance against the hull. These forces are very different. An easy way to demonstrate this is to take a piece of paper and slide it across a dry piece of glass. Now wet the glass and try to slide the paper across it. I am all for trying new things but this is something that has already been tried and proven not to work.
Hurry and get that boat done. I want to see that jet at one of the GTG's this year.
Last Mohican said:
ChryslerJet said:The Tunnel Hump you can see it right before the intake grate
![]()
That is the hump I am wondering if I need to straighten to get a straight shot into the intake grate or do I leave it there because that is a section that tends to create an air pocket when under speed.
Also the mating point to the back of the hull I wondered if I should forma scoop (shoe) into the fiberglass to aid in forcing more water into the intake at speed. Or would that slow me down.
Matt thats what I was wondering based on what I have read. But without confirmation that what I was seeing was what I was reading I wasnt sure. Thanks for the confirmation. It will stay.Last Mohican said:ChryslerJet said:The Tunnel Hump you can see it right before the intake grate
![]()
That is the hump I am wondering if I need to straighten to get a straight shot into the intake grate or do I leave it there because that is a section that tends to create an air pocket when under speed.
Also the mating point to the back of the hull I wondered if I should forma scoop (shoe) into the fiberglass to aid in forcing more water into the intake at speed. Or would that slow me down.
I would not change anything. Chrysler engineers were pretty sharp. That spoon (hump) directs water to the top of the intake. It's called the Coanda effect. Give me a minute to search youtube for a vid. It uses an actual spoon to demonstrate perfectly what happens to the flow of water. At the very least run it as is to get a base line. Then you can make changes and see if it hurts or helps. If you change it now you will never know if you helped or hurt it.
Here it is. You can google it if you want more info.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvLwqRCbGKY